Re: [atlarge-discuss] At-Large Representative?

[DannyYounger@cs.com]

Sotiris, 

Thank you for your offer.  Participants on this dicussion list may wish to 
begin by reviewing the preliminary commentary on this topic produced by Ross 
Rader's 68-member Ad-Hoc group:   
http://lyris.tucows.com:8080/read/?forum=whois-coordination&max=100&skip=0&orderby=CreatStamp_+DESC

A complete list of all participants in this Ad-Hoc group (which includes 
representatives from every ICANN constituency, privacy rights organizations, NTIA, 
the USPTO, ARIN, the FTC, etc.) is posted at:
http://lyris.tucows.com:8080/read/messages?id=180849

My own concern as a user:  

I have an unlisted telephone number.  I pay a fee for this service and have 
many good reasons for using such a service.  I seek an equivalent service (for 
the same reasons) in the domain name system.  Unlisted phone numbers do not 
deter law enforcement officials from accessing telephone company records when 
required, and neither will unlisted domains deter those with a right to examine 
the domain's contact data.  Publication of private contact data should be 
permission-based.  ICANN's adhesion contracts abrogate those rights to privacy.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de