Re: [atlarge-discuss] Quorum: Members said

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Joop, Darryl AKA "Dessa" and all fellow members,

  You are spot on here on this point, Joop.

  None the less there is no *Representative's* to date even
if we legitimately elect a panel some day.  A "panel" is not
a set or group of *Representative's*.

Joop Teernstra wrote:

> At 12:29 a.m. 15/06/2003, Dassa wrote:
> >With a quorum you are talking about the
> >smallest number of members you would trust to make an informed vote.
>
> Quorum is not about an informed vote, it is about a *representative* vote.
> Quorum is at the heart of all democratic decisions.
>
> In Australia the idea is taken so seriously that voting is compulsory for
> all citizens.
>
>   Perhaps 9 would be a good figure
> >all could agree with?
>
> I could.
> But absent panel members could frustrate the vote if they would be allowed to.
>
> -joop-
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de

Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 131k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
    Pierre Abelard
===============================================================
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 214-244-3801



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de