[atlarge-discuss] Panel Repudiates or Not...

[Walter Schmidt <walts@dorsai.org>]

Folks -

A point of clarification...

I would like our Panel to comment directly, as to whether they repudiate
Jefsey's statement that by their actions they have supported Jefsey's use
of the DotWS mailing lists, as they WERE USED.

I have included the full-message following to keep the comments "in
context." The particular statement in question is the last paragraph which
reads:
   "Anyway the 9 (?) Members Panel 6 votes thanks for the election
organization already took that blunder into account, did it not."

I, for one, hope the Panel does decide to comment on this.

For me, errors-made I have no problem with, hubris, perceived or
otherwise, is quite another story...

 ---  REgards, walts ----------------------------------------


On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, "J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin" wrote:

>
> To: Atlarge Discuss List <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
> Subject: [atlarge-discuss] apologies
> From: "J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin" <jefsey@club-internet.fr>
> Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 13:51:50 +0200
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dear All,
> I apologize for the way the broadcast of the results was made. To stop it
> I killed the list. This prevents me from understanding what I made wrong
> (I pay for the traffic) and documenting my error.
>
> My intent was to clean the list in going faster (10 hours to send
> individual votes), from another source (to make sure e-mails were not
> blocked by my ISP) and to get all the responses on the same file in having
> the ReplyTo set to the list admin e-mail.
>
> But this ReplyTo change has not been taken into account. I usually recall
> the Mailman pages to make sure the entry was accepted after clicking it (I
> experienced problems in the past). This time I did not.
>
> This misfit however permitted to add to the requirements for a Postfix GPL
> voting module. Everyone interested please contact me. It also produced
> indications on clones with the same robot responding the same odd response
> witht the same signature for different names.
>
> Anyway the 9 (?) Members Panel 6 votes thanks for the election
> organization already took that blunder into account, did it not.
> jfc
> .
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de