RE: [atlarge-discuss] A Quorum By Any Other Name...

[<bruce@barelyadequate.info>]

Walter Schmidt wrote:

|  Looking at 11
|
|   - if we did 2/3rds we would have a quorum of 8.
|   - if we did 1/2...we would have a quorum of 6.
|
|  For me, a quorum of 7 makes sense - realizing it's all subjective :)

 I agree with 7

|  As to our 1,000 - for the time being I would not set a quorum...

Indeed!  And certainly not until a method or methods are agreed upon to
verify members as real individuals, and we've been through the list!

Bruce Young
Portland, Oregon USA
bruce@barelyadequate.info
http://www.barelyadequate.info
--------------------------------------------
Support democratic control of the Internet!
Go to http://www.icannatlarge.org and Join ICANN At Large!



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de