RE: [atlarge-discuss] Forum Usage at dot-org

["Abel Wisman" <abel@able-towers.com>]

I fail to see what needs to be so "private" that matters concerning
web-comm can not be discussed in public.

I would like to see an example of that information that the world has no
need of knowledge of.

We are chosen, so is the webcomm. Therefore the membership has a right
to read what is discussed.

Abel


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hugh Blair [mailto:hblair@hotfootmail.com] 
> Sent: 12 July 2003 21:05
> To: atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
> Subject: RE: [atlarge-discuss] Forum Usage at dot-org
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Abel Wisman
> > 
> > As for the closed web team part, I oppose that though I do 
> support no 
> > posting rights it should be open for all to read.
> 
> There are times when the web team need to pass information to 
> each other without the whole world seeing it. If you open 
> that one section to the public then you've forced us to talk 
> via private emails. 
> 
> That would be the only solution. If we have to do that, 
> private messages will still be passed around but the ease of 
> use goes down.
> 
> I disagree with your post.
> Hugh
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de