RE: [atlarge-discuss] Another lawsuit against ICANN, to stop WLS

["Abel Wisman" <abel@able-towers.com>]

Danny, you must have missed a lot of posts on the topic on the GA and
other lists you are subscribed to, or is this selective memory?

WLS is as much a non issue this organization as VGRS is a non issue to
ICANN.

You now better, why post this kind of nonsense ?

Abel


> -----Original Message-----
> From: DannyYounger@cs.com [mailto:DannyYounger@cs.com] 
> Sent: 16 July 2003 04:21
> To: hblair@hotfootmail.com; atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
> Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] Another lawsuit against ICANN, 
> to stop WLS
> 
> 
> While I can understand why WLS is a concern to those offering 
> competing 
> services, I have yet to hear why the implementation of WLS 
> would pose a concern to 
> users (other than the lack of any refund if the subscription 
> fails to produce 
> results).  I tend to view WLS as a non-issue, but I am willing to be 
> enlightened...
> ---------------------
> 
> << Below I'm passing a message from George K to the atlarge.  
> Things are starting to heat up over the WLS. Should the 
>  atlarge form an opinion and voice it to various organizations?
>  
>  For? Against? Why?
>  
>  Hugh >>
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de