[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[FYI] EFF Memo in Opposition to DeCSS Suit
- To: debate@fitug.de
- Subject: [FYI] EFF Memo in Opposition to DeCSS Suit
- From: "Axel H Horns" <horns@t-online.de>
- Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2000 11:14:26 +0200
- CC: krypto@thur.de
- Comment: This message comes from the debate mailing list.
- Organization: PA Axel H Horns
- Reply-to: horns@t-online.de
- Sender: owner-debate@fitug.de
http://www.eff.org/pub/Intellectual_property/DVD/20000107-pi-motion-
response.html
----------------------------- CUT ------------------------------
DVD COPY CONTROL ASSOCIATION, INC., a not-for-profit trade
association,
Plaintiff,
v.
ANDREW THOMAS MCLAUGHLIN and ANDREW BUNNER, et al.,
Defendants.
DEFENDANT'S MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION TO
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
[...]
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA - COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
DVD COPY CONTROL ASSOCIATION, INC., a not-for-profit trade
association,
Plaintiff,
v.
ANDREW THOMAS MCLAUGHLIN and ANDREW BUNNER, et al.,
Defendants.
NO. CV786804
DEFENDANT'S BUNNER'S MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN
OPPOSITION TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AGAINST
ALL DEFENDANTS
Date: January 14, 2000
Time: 1:30 p.m.
Dept.: 2
Honorable William J. Elfving
1. INTRODUCTION
[...]
4. CONCLUSION
By this motion, plaintiff seeks to hold back the water after the dam
has broken. Moreover, in a country founded on personal
freedoms and sustained by creativity and growth, public discourse
over issues of academic and public concern and independent
innovation should not be subjugated by private interests. For these
reasons and those set forth above, these defendants
respectfully urge the Court to deny the motion.
Dated: January 7, 2000 TOMLINSON ZISKO MOROSOLI & MASER LLP
By:
Richard Allan Horning
Attorneys for Defendant ANDREW BUNNER
----------------------------- CUT ------------------------------