[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[FYI] (Fwd) FC: Cyberpatrol suit takes GNU twist -- Mattel's victory
- To: debate@fitug.de
- Subject: [FYI] (Fwd) FC: Cyberpatrol suit takes GNU twist -- Mattel's victory
- From: "Axel H Horns" <horns@t-online.de>
- Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 18:03:56 +0100
- Comment: This message comes from the debate mailing list.
- Organization: PA Axel H Horns
- Reply-to: horns@t-online.de
- Sender: owner-debate@fitug.de
------- Forwarded message follows -------
Date sent: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 10:00:49 -0500
To: politech@vorlon.mit.edu
From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
Subject: FC: Cyberpatrol suit takes GNU twist -- Mattel's victory not one
Send reply to: declan@well.com
I've put up the first few lines of the cphack utility which explicitly
releases it under the GPL at:
http://www.politechbot.com/cyberpatrol/cphack-gpl.txt
**********
http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,35226,00.html
Mattel Suit Takes GNU Twist
by Declan McCullagh (declan@wired.com)
3:00 a.m. Mar. 28, 2000 PST
BOSTON -- Mattel's claim of victory Monday in a lawsuit over its
Cyberpatrol filtering software may be premature.
The toy giant said during a court hearing here that it had
acquired intellectual property rights to a program that reveals
Cyberpatrol's secret list of off-limits websites and settled the
case. Mattel said it planned to use its new copyright in court to
ban Internet copying of the "cphack" utility.
But cphack's authors released it under the GNU General Public
License, which appears to permit unlimited distribution of the
original cphack program, even if Mattel now owns the copyright.
"Once you do that you can't revoke it," said Bennett Haselton of
Peacefire, a group opposed to filtering software that temporarily
put up its own cphack mirror site.
The Free Software Foundation's GPL agreement says that "the
recipient automatically receives a license from the original
licensor to copy, distribute or modify the program."
Translation: A copyright holder can't change his mind.
"GPL is software that cannot be revoked," said Eben Moglen, a law
professor at Columbia University and FSF general counsel. "Anyone
downstream who possesses a copy of the software may redistribute
it.
"It's a very amusing case," Moglen said. "If people are going to
respond to free software they don't like by trying to wipe it out,
they're in for some real trouble."
A spokeswoman for Mattel reached late Monday said she didn't know
what the effect of the GPL would be.
But she said cphack authors Eddy Jansson and Matthew Skala had
signed a contract with Mattel and if there was any deception,
"they'd be in big trouble."
[...]
*********
http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,35216,00.html
Mattel Stays on the Offensive
by Declan McCullagh (declan@wired.com)
2:45 p.m. Mar. 27, 2000 PST
BOSTON -- Upping the stakes in a battle over a utility that
reveals Cyberpatrol's list of off-limits websites, Mattel
threatened mirror sites with contempt charges during a court
hearing Monday afternoon.
Mattel, which sells Cyberpatrol, said the toy giant had acquired
the copyright to "cphack" from the two cryptoanalysts who
published it on their website earlier this month in a settlement
agreement signed on March 24.
Citing a March 16 Slashdot thread that said "it's time to
mirror!", Mattel attorney Irwin Schwartz advised against anyone
thinking of distributing cphack from now on.
[...]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
---- POLITECH -- the moderated mailing list of politics and technology
To subscribe, visit http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----
------- End of forwarded message -------