[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[FYI] "What if somebody patentened a legal argument"?
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: [FYI] "What if somebody patentened a legal argument"?
- From: Kristian Köhntopp <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 07:34:27 +0200
- >Received: from koehntopp.de (valiant.koehntopp.de [126.96.36.199])by white.koehntopp.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) with ESMTP id HAA32341for <email@example.com>; Tue, 30 May 2000 07:31:30 +0200
- Comment: This message comes from the debate mailing list.
- Organization: Pinguin an Bord.
- Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org
Tim: Are you a lawyer by training?
Dickinson: Yes, I am.
Tim: How would you feel if a lawyer was able to patent an
Dickinson: If it was new and non-obvious, I wouldn't have a
problem with it at all.
Tim: And the ability to basically extract a royalty from other
lawyers for using that same legal argument?
Dickinson: As I say, if it's new, and if it met the statutory
standards for patentability (and that's the key question here), and
it was incorporated into software in some form, that wouldn't be a
Tim: No, not in software. Just in actual, in court.
Dickinson: Well, I don't want to deal in hypotheticals. The courts
haven't dealt with that question.
"Papa, duerfen wir das Perl fuettern?"
-- Michael Zuelsdorff, in der iX 6/2000