[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[FYI] The CEC is currently working on a Communication on cybercrime
- To: debate@fitug.de
- Subject: [FYI] The CEC is currently working on a Communication on cybercrime
- From: "Axel H Horns" <horns@ipjur.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 18:05:39 +0200
- Comment: This message comes from the debate mailing list.
- Organization: NONE
- Sender: owner-debate@fitug.de
http://europa.eu.int/rapid/start/cgi/guesten.ksh?p_action.gettxt=gt&do
c=SPEECH/00/344|0|RAPID&lg=EN
----------------------------- CUT -------------------------------
Erkki LIIKANEN Member of the European Commission responsible for
Enterprise and the Information Society "Trust and security in
electronic communications: The European contribution" Information
Security Solutions Europe Conference "ISSE 2000" Barcelona, 29
September 2000
DN: SPEECH/00/344 Date: 2000-10-02
TXT: EN
PDF: EN
Word Processed: EN
SPEECH/00/344
Erkki LIIKANEN
Member of the European Commission responsible for Enterprise and the
Information Society
"Trust and security in electronic communications: The European
contribution"
Information Security Solutions Europe Conference "ISSE 2000"
Barcelona, 29 September 2000
[...]
3. FIGHTING CYBERCRIME
Does this mean that we can focus our attention on other information
society issues? I'm afraid no. Another pressing issue for us is to
step up the fight against cybercrime.
Prevention is essential. Thanks to the new legal environment, we can
hope that security technologies will take care of most of the job.
But if, and when, a major security threat arises, public authorities
must have the means to strike back.
One thing is clear: in the Internet age - which is a borderless age -
this is not something that can be done in isolation. Thus,
governments must urgently reinforce their collaboration in the fight
against cybercrime
Important international efforts have been undertaken, in particular
by the G8 and the Council of Europe. But there are two main reasons
why we should, in parallel, step up our efforts within the EU:
First, making headway at international level is always a complex and
time-consuming process. Conflicting national interests can be at
stake, and inter-governmental negotiations are always difficult. But
within the EU, we share the same interests. And we are used to
working together, on the basis of well-oiled mechanisms. So we can go
further and faster.
Second, the good work we can do within the EU can have a positive
impact at international level. EU countries can present a united
front. And they can set an example that can foster greater
international collaboration. In sum, we should create fast and
efficient mechanisms amongst EU Member States, which could then be
extended - at least partly - at international level.
The Commission is currently working on a Communication on cybercrime
which aims to set orientations for the future. Hopefully, we will be
as successful as we were with our Communication on cryptography of
1997: starting from scratch, we secured the Internal Market for
security in a matter of three years.
But whatever action we undertake, the philosophy that must prevail is
that the Internet is - and must remain - an area of freedom. Paranoia
and fear should not blind us.
Hence the necessity to strike the right balance between, on the one
hand, the freedom to move and undertake freely on the Internet, and
on the other, the necessity to sometimes restrain this very freedom
to defeat crime. Thus, the instruments that law enforcement agencies
use must be carefully circumscribed, and be based on very precise
rules.
4. SUPPORTING INDUSTRY EFFORTS
Is there anything else the Commission can do besides all that? Yes,
there is. We have a lot of leverage power, both trough our financial
capacity and through our political influence. We will continue to put
this power at the service of the European security industry and
citizens in the following ways:
First, by supporting industry efforts through the Information Society
Technology Programme. That concerns in particular the development of
privacy-enhancing technologies, standardisation and interoperability.
A main focus of our action is smartcards which, beyond being a major
European strength, is a leading technology for a secure key
management. This also concerns technologies which do not yet present
a major commercial interest for industry, for instance in the area of
electronic democracy.
Second, we support the development of security platforms based on
open-source software. The aim is to help the security industry bypass
the obstacles created by proprietary software - in particular for
desk-top security.
[...]
----------------------------- CUT -------------------------------