[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[FYI] Freenet: Will It Smash Copyright Law?
- To: debate@fitug.de
- Subject: [FYI] Freenet: Will It Smash Copyright Law?
- From: "Axel H Horns" <horns@ipjur.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 18:47:46 +0100
- Comment: This message comes from the debate mailing list.
- Comments: Sender has elected to use 8-bit data in this message. If problems arise, refer to postmaster at sender's site.
- Organization: NONE
- Sender: owner-debate@fitug.de
http://www.newsbytes.com/news/01/163395.html
------------------------------ CUT --------------------------------
Freenet: Will It Smash Copyright Law?
By Kevin Featherly, Newsbytes
SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA, U.S.A.,
20 Mar 2001, 2:44 PM CST
This is an age, Ian Clarke says, when copyright laws and freedom of
speech cannot coexist. One of them has to go. And, if he has anything
to say about it, freedom of speech won't be the one.
[...]
No Names, Please
Perhaps the crux of Freenet's philosophy is the idea of anonymity.
Clarke says anonymity is the essential element of unrestricted free
speech. "If you cannot remain anonymous, then you can be punished for
what you say, thus discouraging others from putting forward their
opinions," he said.
It's an idea that has many champions, but Esther Dyson, founding
chairman of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
(ICANN) is not one of them. While she too believes that copyrights
may need to go, replaced by such things as paid public appearances by
writers and the like, in her book "Release 2.0," Dyson expresses
reservations about encouraging the use of anonymity in online
society.
"When people operate anonymously," Dyson writes, "there's no
incentive to tell the truth; dishonest people easily betray others
for their own gain. … Overall, everyone is worse off on average."
[...]
------------------------------ CUT --------------------------------