[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [FYI] (Fwd) FC: License-drafting lawyer replies on Borland move:It's entirely common
- To: Axel H Horns <horns@ipjur.com>
- Subject: Re: [FYI] (Fwd) FC: License-drafting lawyer replies on Borland move:It's entirely common
- From: Heiko Recktenwald <uzs106@ibm.rhrz.uni-bonn.de>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 21:26:47 +0100 (CET)
- cc: debate@lists.fitug.de
- Delivered-To: mailing list debate@lists.fitug.de
- In-Reply-To: <3C4322BC.3718.1A27E7@localhost>
- List-Help: <mailto:debate-help@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Id: <debate.lists.fitug.de>
- List-Post: <mailto:debate@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:debate-subscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:debate-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- Mailing-List: contact debate-help@lists.fitug.de; run by ezmlm
> case they are including it for consumer software. Many software
> packages charge based on the type of computer or the # of users, and
> the only way that restriction is 'enforced' is through audit, and the
> 'fear of audit' is a sufficient deterrent in many cases to prevent
> large companies from violating the licenses to their enterprise
> software.
Aber sowas waere hier vermutlich so wenig durchsetzbar wie pretrial
discoveries.
Rigo ?
H.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: debate-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: debate-help@lists.fitug.de