[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[FYI] (Fwd) FC: Swedish paper found liable for pro-Nazi rants on discussion board
- To: debate@lists.fitug.de
- Subject: [FYI] (Fwd) FC: Swedish paper found liable for pro-Nazi rants on discussion board
- From: "Axel H Horns" <horns@ipjur.com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 21:35:05 +0100
- Delivered-To: mailing list debate@lists.fitug.de
- List-Help: <mailto:debate-help@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Id: <debate.lists.fitug.de>
- List-Post: <mailto:debate@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:debate-subscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:debate-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- Mailing-List: contact debate-help@lists.fitug.de; run by ezmlm
- Organization: NONE
- Priority: normal
------- Forwarded message follows -------
Date sent: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 13:21:23 -0500
From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
To: politech@politechbot.com
Subject: FC: Swedish paper found liable for pro-Nazi rants on discussion board
Send reply to: declan@well.com
Also see:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/24352.html
---
http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2002/3/7/15844/31987
Swedish court holds forum owner responsible (Freedom & Politics)
Thu Mar 7th, 2002 at 04:19:42 PM EST
In a ruling today, a Swedish court holds the editor of thke web
edition of Aftonbladet (a major Swedish newspaper) responsible for
comments published on their forum, and the forum has subsequently
closed. Aftonbladet was one of the first Swedish newspapers with a
web edition. They are still the most visited website in Sweden, and
they have up until today encouraged their visitors to voice their
opinion on different news items in an online forum called 'Tyck
till' ("Your opinion"). In October 2000, four posts on the forum
expressed Nazi sympathies, and owing to some technical problems,
they were not deleted from the forum (which is moderated) for some
time. This caused charges to be brought on Aftonbladet for
agitation against an ethnic group, and the matter was resolved
today when the editor of the web edition was found guilty of the
charges, on the grounds that the posts were published in the first
place. The Swedish constitution states that freedom of speech does
not include the right to agitate against an ethnic group, and this
was what the court felt was more important than the fact that the
editor tried to remove the offending posts. This ruling sets a
precedent whereby the publisher of a website can be held
responsible for what is published in an open forum, and it might
even spell the end for unmoderated online discussion on Swedish
websites.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--- POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing
list You may redistribute this message freely if you include this
notice. Declan McCullagh's photographs are at
http://www.mccullagh.org/ To subscribe to Politech:
http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html This message is
archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
---
------- End of forwarded message -------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: debate-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: debate-help@lists.fitug.de