[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Subitext anyone?

To: debate@fitug.de
Subject: Re: Subitext anyone?
From: Martin Schröder <martin@oneiros.de>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 1999 11:58:02 +0200
Comment: This message comes from the debate mailing list.
In-Reply-To: <199910211135000470.006291D5@mail.kamp.net>
Mail-Followup-To: debate@fitug.de
References: <7ud7s2$bhv$1@seneca.muc.de> <199910182132510380.008484E6@mail.kamp.net> <19991018231609.E23433@greenie.muc.de> <19991019090535.B25877@gmd.de> <199910211135000470.006291D5@mail.kamp.net>
Sender: owner-debate@fitug.de

On 1999-10-21 11:35:00 +0200, Kai Raven wrote:
> On 19.10.1999 to subject "Re: Subitext anyone?", you wrote:
> 
> >> Klingt nach 0-Bit-Kompression.  Ist der Text denn rekonstruierbar?
> 
> >Man sollte ein diff ueber den od-Output von Original und Text+verstecktem
> >Text drueber laufen lassen.
> 
> Sorry, gibt es diff auch für Windows ?
> Dann würde ich gerne mal nachsehen.

diff gibt's für DOS und ansonsten gibt's cygwin (www.cygnus.com).

Gruß
   Martin

PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Subitext anyone?
  - From: "Kai Raven" <kai.raven@ob.kamp.net>

References:
- Subitext anyone?
  - From: Harald Milz <hm@seneca.muc.de>
- Re: Subitext anyone?
  - From: "Kai Raven" <kai.raven@ob.kamp.net>
- Re: Subitext anyone?
  - From: Gert Doering <gert@greenie.muc.de>
- Re: Subitext anyone?
  - From: Holger Veit <Holger.Veit@gmd.de>
- Re: Subitext anyone?
  - From: "Kai Raven" <kai.raven@ob.kamp.net>
- Re: Subitext anyone?
  - From: "Kai Raven" <kai.raven@ob.kamp.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Herr H.
Next by Date: RE: Subitext anyone?
Prev by thread: Re: Subitext anyone?
Next by thread: Re: Subitext anyone?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread