[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Patents? Of course not!

To: debate@fitug.de
Subject: Re: Patents? Of course not!
From: Roland Dieterich <roland.dieterich@gmd.de>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 1999 15:02:44 +0100
Comment: This message comes from the debate mailing list.
Organization: Department of Agreeable Sounds
References: <Pine.BSF.3.91.991123145311.22615K-100000@phobos.muc.de> <000201bf36a8$f50340e0$bc045c8b@deep.space> <383D30C8.36E940A1@gmd.de> <19991125142615.C9703@sobolev.rhein.de>
Sender: owner-debate@fitug.de

Thomas Roessler schrob:

> > In aehnlicher Form duerften uebrigens auch Software (Musik,
> > Buecher) durchfallen, die das Copyright ans Geraet binden.
> 
> Windows 2000?

Monopolprodukt das mangels Konkurrenz zu *jeder* Bedingung ueber den
Ladentisch geht. Relevant waere die Betrachtung von verdongeltem Windows
2.x und 3.x. Fuer deren Verbreitung war die Existenz von Raubkopien
nicht ganz unwichtig.

MfG, Roland

-- 
Roland Dieterich 	FIT.MMK
Fon: +49-2241-14-2757   Fax: +49-2241-14-2065

References:
- Re: Patents? Of course not!
  - From: Rudolf Schreiner <ras@muc.de>
- Re: Patents? Of course not!
  - From: "K.Peter Meyer" <kpm-ml@gmx.de>
- Re: Patents? Of course not!
  - From: Roland Dieterich <roland.dieterich@gmd.de>
- Re: Patents? Of course not!
  - From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@guug.de>

Prev by Date: Re: Patents? Of course not!
Next by Date: Re: DLF ueber Echelon und Wirtschaftsspionage
Prev by thread: Re: Patents? Of course not!
Next by thread: [FYI] (Fwd) [NETLAW-L] Tagung 18./19.02.2000 in Berlin: Grundrechte
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread