[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ICANN-EU] second-level-domains
- To: Oliver Thuns <icann@thuns.de>
- Subject: Re: [ICANN-EU] second-level-domains
- From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
- Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 16:56:48 +0200
- Cc: "icann-europe@fitug.de" <icann-europe@fitug.de>
- Comment: This message comes from the icann-europe mailing list.
- In-Reply-To: <200008141439.e7EEdAW27616@mailhost.fh-muenchen.de>; from icann@thuns.de on Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 04:38:50PM +0200
- Mail-Followup-To: Oliver Thuns <icann@thuns.de>,"icann-europe@fitug.de" <icann-europe@fitug.de>
- References: <200008141439.e7EEdAW27616@mailhost.fh-muenchen.de>
- Sender: owner-icann-europe@fitug.de
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.7i
On 2000-08-14 16:38:50 +0200, Oliver Thuns wrote:
> .nl.shop
> .fi.shop
> .de.shop
> .eu.shop
> .us.shop
> .??.shop
> You only have to block all 2 character registrations.
By an obvious symmetry argument, this is equivalent to the ccTLD
system we already have, with just putting "structuring" 2nd level
domains in betweek, such as .co.uk, .edu.pl, and the like.
Is there any country which actually does this in a consequent
manner, and where this helps to avoid _any_ conflicts?
--
Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>