[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ICANN-EU] This week
- To: Alexander Svensson <svensson@icannchannel.de>
- Subject: Re: [ICANN-EU] This week
- From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
- Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 19:19:06 +0200
- Cc: Icann-europe@fitug.de
- Comment: This message comes from the icann-europe mailing list.
- In-Reply-To: <E13dW0c-0001aB-00@mrvdom00.kundenserver.de>; from svensson@icannchannel.de on Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 12:57:28PM +0200
- Mail-Followup-To: Alexander Svensson <svensson@icannchannel.de>,Icann-europe@fitug.de
- References: <E13dW0c-0001aB-00@mrvdom00.kundenserver.de>
- Sender: owner-icann-europe@fitug.de
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.9i
On 2000-09-25 12:57:28 +0200, Alexander Svensson wrote:
> The list charter seems to be uncontroversial, so
> we should get this off the to-do list this week.
Agreed.
> However, we might consider an anti-crossposting rule and *filter*
> (as in place on the DNSO-GA list).
Roberto: Could you please elaborate on what you have in place on
ga@dnso.org? Do you just junk messages cross-posted to one of the
other well-known lists?
> There are numerous ICANN-related lists, and if Icann-Europe gets
> all the CC mails to IFWP, Domain-Policy, IDNO- Discuss and
> NCDNHC-Discuss, we are going to *drown*. Is it technically
> possible?
Quite a few things are possible with majordomo. We just have to
decide what we wish. Essentially, messages which match arbitrary
regular expressions in the header or budy can be rejected.
> - agree on such a European At Large Member forum,
> - want to work with Icann (and others?) on how to organize
> and establish it,
> - want to apply guiding principles such as openness
> and transparency,
> - invite everyone in Europe interested in ICANN-related
> matters to join the list!
Sounds like a nice statement. Do you want to prepare a draft for
this?
--
Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>