[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ICANN-EU] RFD #1: Forum bylaws
- To: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>, icann-europe@fitug.de
- Subject: Re: [ICANN-EU] RFD #1: Forum bylaws
- From: Dmitri Bourkov <dburk@rt.ru>
- Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 16:04:12 +0400
- Comment: This message comes from the icann-europe mailing list.
- References: <39D37674.20200.650B7E@localhost> <39D3A1A1.28DED6A3@ix.netcom.com>
- Sender: owner-icann-europe@fitug.de
Jeff Williams wrote:
> Jeanette Hofmann wrote:
>
> > Rough consensus would be my favorite option. As long as we
> > understand ourselves as open forum, we should stick to informal
> > procedures of consensus-building. This list is still too small yet to
> > decide upon rules that will affect all future members.
>
> How do you propose that "Rough Consensus" be determines or
> measured, Jeanette? Our members have many times expressed
> a definitive answer to this question that is tangible. What is your
> answer/opinion?
>
As I remember, during pre-ICANN process
NSI and US lawyers interpreted "rough consensus" as 60% and more.
Is it the same?
regards,
Dmitri Bourkov