[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [icann-eu] Document on study working group?
- To: Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
- Subject: Re: [icann-eu] Document on study working group?
- From: Marc Schneiders <marc@schneiders.org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2000 21:13:22 +0100 (CET)
- cc: icann-europe@fitug.de
- Comment: This message comes from the icann-europe mailing list.
- In-Reply-To: <20001115172546.B5969@sobolev.does-not-exist.org>
- Sender: owner-icann-europe@fitug.de
On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, at 17:25 [=GMT+0100], Thomas Roessler wrote:
> Assuming that the ICANN board adopts the staff recommendations on
> the At Large Study Committee, there will be a 30-days period
> following the conclusion of the MdR meeting during which the board
> will solicit comments.
>
> I'd like to suggest that we try to work out a consensus document on
> these staff recommendations, and post it to ICANN during the
> comments period. I'm volunteering to edit such a document, based on
> my own ideas and input from this list. Once finished, there would
> be a call for support on this list, in the hope that as many list
> members as possible support the result.
>
> Are there any objections against this procedure?
Not from me. Please, go ahead. From a quick scanning of the
document I am under the impression that this is merely about the
procedure. How the study shall be done and by whom. This is important
enough though to avoid a pre-cooked report.
So we suggest names as well?
--
Marc Schneiders (rest in header)
> If we can agree on
> this, we should start collecting ideas on the staff recommendation
> as soon as the board has declared that they will follow the
> suggested procedure.
>
> --
> Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
>