Re: [icann-eu] Document on study working group?

[Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>]

Thanks for the offer, Thomas. 
Yes, each member could both underwrite the common EU document and still be
free to post personal comments if (s)he has the time. 


At 02:49 19/11/00 +0100, Jefsey Morfin wrote:
>Sounds good to me too.
>Jefsey
>
>At 21:51 18/11/00, you wrote:
>>Sounds good to me!
>>
>>Alan Lenton
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "Thomas Roessler" <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
>>To: <icann-europe@fitug.de>
>>Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 4:25 PM
>>Subject: [icann-eu] Document on study working group?
>>
>>
>> > Assuming that the ICANN board adopts the staff recommendations on
>> > the At Large Study Committee, there will be a 30-days period
>> > following the conclusion of the MdR meeting during which the board
>> > will solicit comments.
>> >
>> > I'd like to suggest that we try to work out a consensus document on
>> > these staff recommendations, and post it to ICANN during the
>> > comments period.  I'm volunteering to edit such a document, based on
>> > my own ideas and input from this list.  Once finished, there would
>> > be a call for support on this list, in the hope that as many list
>> > members as possible support the result.
>> >
>> > Are there any objections against this procedure?  If we can agree on
>> > this, we should start collecting ideas on the staff recommendation
>> > as soon as the board has declared that they will follow the
>> > suggested procedure.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Thomas Roessler                         <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
>> >
> 

--Joop Teernstra LL.M.--  
the Cyberspace Association and 
the constituency for Individual Domain Name Owners
Elected representative.
http://www.idno.org