[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [icann-eu] Re: [ICANN-EU] ccTLDs to ask for BoD seats?
- To: icann-europe@fitug.de
- Subject: Re: [icann-eu] Re: [ICANN-EU] ccTLDs to ask for BoD seats?
- From: t byfield <tbyfield@panix.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2000 15:17:04 -0500
- Comment: This message comes from the icann-europe mailing list.
- In-Reply-To: <F36FRaqbC8wSA1XvpFV00003fc5@hotmail.com>; from roberto_gaetano@hotmail.com on Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 06:22:22PM +0100
- Mail-Followup-To: t byfield <tbyfield@panix.com>, icann-europe@fitug.de
- References: <F36FRaqbC8wSA1XvpFV00003fc5@hotmail.com>
- Sender: owner-icann-europe@fitug.de
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
roberto_gaetano@hotmail.com (Fri 11/24/00 at 06:22 PM +0100):
> First of all, we still have the official positions of Twomey and Wilkinson
> (AU+EU GAC reps) that reconsideration of the AtLarge Board seats may push
> the governments to reconsider their current position.
roberto--
if you could point me to some URLs or documents in which this
position was clearly stated, i'd be grateful. i know that both
of them said something like this at yokohama,[*] but i wasn't
aware that this was a formal position.
[*] RealAudio + timecodes and trancripts at:
http://www.tbtf.com/roving_reporter/icann1.html#11
cheers,
t
--
\|/ ____ \|/
@~/ oO \~@ <http://www.tbtf.com/roving_reporter/>
/_( \__/ )_\
\_U__/