Re: [icann-eu] Members of California non-profit corporations

[Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>]

On 2000-12-08 12:49:01 +0100, Jefsey Morfin wrote:

>>Finally, I should of course add that I haven't had any formal
>>legal training.

> here is the single place where you are right.  ;-).

Don't you think it would be appropriate to elaborate on the details
a bit more?  Just stating that I'm wrong on every point WITHOUT
GIVING ANY EVIDENCE OR REASONING doesn't help anyone here, and isn't
the kind of behaviour I'd expect from you.

> PS. Your response is the same as Alexander.  Basically you say
> that a question is wrong.

This is nonsense.  I've been saying that your question is (1) silly
and (2) irrelevant for this list.  I do know that a question can't
normally be "wrong".

> I note that your only repeated response, after some
> considerations, is "we do not need to consider the question". 

You may wish to read, understand, and comment on these
considerations.

> I am only expecting from German competent lawyers: "for Germany:
> yes in such cases, no in other cases".

> I will report the professionnal responses I may obtain.

Jefsey, I have been, so far, expecting reasonable questions and
arguments from you.  It seems that this expectation is wrong and you
are actually just trying to waste everyone's time.


Let me, finally, correct one of the last sentences of my longer
message earlier today: I wrote there that the questions you are
rising are "mostly relevant".  This was a typo, and should have been
"irrelevant".

-- 
Thomas Roessler                         <roessler@does-not-exist.org>