[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ICANN-EU] Re: Elections/Endorsements
- To: Andreas Fügner <Andreas.Fuegner@lizenz.com>
- Subject: [ICANN-EU] Re: Elections/Endorsements
- From: Marc Schneiders <marc@venster.nl>
- Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2000 19:14:20 +0200 (MEST)
- cc: icann-europe@fitug.de
- Comment: This message comes from the icann-europe mailing list.
- In-Reply-To: <002201c00531$05b72940$0b0aa8c0@f-gner>
- Sender: owner-icann-europe@fitug.de
Dear Andreas,
On Sun, 13 Aug 2000, Andreas Fügner wrote:
> Dear Marc:
>
> Whithout mediation / arbitration the only way is into court.
> Thus, it is positive to have another procedure before hand.
Not per se. Courts do not accept cases so easily as WIPO. Often there
would have been no case, but for WIPO.
> Please look at the list of cases at WIPO for example. The
> domains in question and the parties involved give a pretty
> good idea about the whole issue. And it puts things a little
> more into perspective.
I have spend some time on the list at WIPO and read a number of the
decisions. I do not deny that there are cases where it was correct to take
a domain from the owner. More often this was not so.
As for perspective: that is exactly what this is all about. I hope you do
not think there is only one, to wit yours. Anyway, your position is now
clear to me. I must have been misled by some of the idealistic words on
your page. I should have given more weight to what you do for a
living: making the companies that have interests in curtailing the free
flow of information happy. I am afraid I am at the other side of the
battle lines.
--
Marc Schneiders ------- Venster - http://www.venster.nl
marc@venster.nl - marc@bijt.net - marc@schneiders.org