[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ICANN-EU] deadline request of reconsideration



Dear Holger:

The opposite is more logical.
One could argue that candidates are only trying to improve their chances.
At-large-members asking for the reconsideration and the change of policy are
surly more important then just candidates.

Andreas Fuegner

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Holger Blasum <blasum@muc.de>
An: Andreas Fügner <Andreas.Fuegner@lizenz.com>
Datum: Dienstag, 15. August 2000 17:19
Betreff: Re: [ICANN-EU] deadline request of reconsideration


>On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 02:50:47PM +0200, Andreas Fügner wrote:
>>
>> ICANN is requested to modify the election process on grounds of equal
rights to the member candidates and the committee nominated candidates. The
members should decide by vote, who will be on the final ballot.
>
>If you want to have more people (just an @large member, not candidate)
subscribing, feel free to add me:
>Holger Blasum, Weigl !interService, Herzog-Heinrich-Str 31, 80336 Muenchen,
>holgerlists@blasum.net
>(but maybe its better to leave it to the candidates)
>financial support ltd to say 50 Eur but not real money .
>
>Regards, Holger
>>
>> Submitted by:
>> name
>> postal address
>> email address
>>
>
>