[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ICANN-EU] About Nom-Com issue and 'reconsideration' petition
- To: "Andreas Fügner" <Andreas.Fuegner@lizenz.com>
- Subject: Re: [ICANN-EU] About Nom-Com issue and 'reconsideration' petition
- From: "Griffini Giorgio" <grigio@mediapoint.it>
- Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2000 13:02:39 +0200
- CC: icann-europe@fitug.de
- Comment: This message comes from the icann-europe mailing list.
- In-reply-to: <006a01c00754$a6e75680$0b0aa8c0@f-gner>
- Sender: owner-icann-europe@fitug.de
You wrote:
> Dear Griffini:
>
> Sorry, to correct you, but Andrew is wrong.
> The decision was made to put nom-com candidates "in front of the
> At-Large-Members".
> It doesn't say that they are to be put on "the ballot" as Andrew says!
>
> This might seem just a small difference. But that is exactly the point of
> our discussion here.
>
Hello,
I think is difficult to give a different meaning to resolution 00.68 of the Board
as shown on preliminary report of Yokohama especially if you read point 8.
Howewer, (supposed we really like to do tricky legal things on rules) we can
try to bring any number of candidates into the final ballot by distributing
endorsements in way they all are over the thresold and in tie.
It is difficult but not so impossible :-)
Best Regards
Giorgio Griffini