Re: [ICANN-EU] A challenging deadlock

["Roberto Gaetano" <roberto_gaetano@hotmail.com>]

Giorgio,

I asked this question to Andrew in July, and he told me that the candidate 
profile could be updateable.
I did not pursue the matter further, because I did not have the need, but I 
don't think that to let you update the page will make an exception.
Keep in mind, though, that people that already read your page will not go 
back and re-read it again.

I suggest you e-mail an updated text to ICANN - if they have time, there is 
no reason why they would not modify it.
Probably a limit should be set (1 or 2 updates per candidate max), to avoid 
exagerations.

Roberto


>From: "Griffini Giorgio" <grigio@mediapoint.it>
>To: icann-europe@fitug.de
>CC: ajm@icann.org
>Subject: [ICANN-EU] A challenging deadlock
>Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2000 03:27:49 +0200
>
>Please take this message (which is not off-topic anyway) as a chance to
>have a short break on our high level election concerns... :)
>
>A day or two after I filled the nomination application and when the
>presentation web page was already showing on the ICANN site, I realized I
>left out some information and I sent a message to election staff in order 
>to
>know if was possibile to update that page. I received no answer so I 
>thought
>(and currently think) that was not possible because this would mean to 
>allow
>the same for other candidates and there were no planned time and resources
>to do this.
>
>On my presentation I was stating I was in wait for an answer from
>IANA/ICANN about a thing I requested for my company.
>
>I'm on vacation these days but I regularly check my job email account
>because there may be issues that need my intervention.
>On email received yesterday there is also the answer I was talking about
>in my presentation.
>This fact makes my current presentation stating improper statement
>because I actually received the answer.
>
>On my side I think it is not fair to leave that misleading statement there
>(almost in respect of involved parties) and that it is not fair that I'm 
>bound to
>be 'unfair' by not being able to update that statement .
>
>On the ICANN side it is not fair to make an exception and allow me to
>update the page while not allowing the same to other candidates.
>
>The most 'curious' thing is that we falled into this deadlock as a result 
>of a
>fair action (giving me an answer) .. .:)
>
>How we can handle this in a 'fair' way ?
>
>BTW: This is definitively *not* a real big concern (the answer I received 
>will
>indeed have a follow-up on my side when I will be back at work next
>Monday..).
>Please take this "problem" (quoted) by the right angle ov view ...
>just a way to have a short break for allowing our higher level concerns to
>develop in the background.
>
>Best Regards
>Giorgio Griffini
>

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com