Re: [ICANN-EU] A challenging deadlock

["Griffini Giorgio" <grigio@mediapoint.it>]

C.S.Chassapis  wrote:
> Dear Giorgio,
> 
> It is a very interesting "deadlock" the one you describe. I believe you are
> responsible for arriving at that deadlock, because you were allowed to
> use URLs in your initial statement, so you were free to put a link and a
> statement of the type: "in few days, here (enter the link) you will find the
> true status of the situation I am describing now".  You were not fair at
> the beginning so you arrived at the deadlock. You did not arrived to the
> deadlock because of fair action as you say. 

Sincerely speaking I had no means to predict the arrival of the answer during 
these days after so long time I was waiting for. In my presentation, for the 
sake of 'fairness'  I preferred howewer to give the benefit of doubt to the 
involved party. 
I already know my fault was not putting on the ICANN an URL pointing to a 
page I'm able to  update by myself (for many reasons... not just to give 'live' 
updates on events which happens to me). 
 I asked if it was possible to update my page but getting 
no answer [(again... :-) ]  I thought this was not possible 
or being seen as a annoying problem. 
I'm not used to put load on others for faults that are mine...so I accepted ,on 
my side, to be bound to very static presentation for these election. 
This was ok for both side (ICANN election staff and me) but the arrival of 
answer caused the sort deadlock I was describing.

I'll repeat myself  here that this is *not* a big concern. :-) 

It is only a two days time window (now one) concern because the answer I 
had will have a follow-up monday when I will be back to work so statement 
on my presentation page will return to be appropriate. 

I wrote about this sort problem on the list for sake of discussion and as a 
little (very little and not a concern) example on how challenging is to put in 
place a election mechanims having the highest degree possibile of fairness 
toward all interested parties, voters, candidates,election staff.

I'll repeat myself  here again that this story is *not* a concern. :-) 

Best regards
Giorgio Griffini