[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ICANN-EU] The real challenge for all of us as candidates
- To: Andreas.Fuegner@lizenz.com, Marc Schneiders <marc@venster.nl>
- Subject: Re: [ICANN-EU] The real challenge for all of us as candidates
- From: "Griffini Giorgio" <grigio@mediapoint.it>
- Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 23:02:38 +0200
- CC: icann-europe@fitug.de
- Comment: This message comes from the icann-europe mailing list.
- In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0008231809120.4404-100000@s025.widexs.nl>
- References: <007501c00d13$855edbe0$0b0aa8c0@f-gner>
- Sender: owner-icann-europe@fitug.de
Dear Andreas an Marc,
(I will wear the Italian Naming Authority member hat now)
I was working on this specific subject for almost one year long and I was a
strong supporter (really fighting) for introducing a sort of Mandatory
Administrative Proceeding on rules for '.it' ccTLD.
I suggest Andreas to take a look to the Final WIPO report instead of relying
on reading separate documents. By reading the WIPO report you will see by
yourself that arbitration and mediation are just two ways to handle disputes
and you will understand why is the 'Mandatory' approach for the
Administrative Proceeding (which is the third way ) is by far more appropriate
to handle 'abusive' registrations.
I think you will be even wonder on the level of concern there is on fact that
domain name registration protections from abuse should be granted to non
trademark owners.
Under the ccTLD'.it' we had a voluntary arbitration available for almost one
year but it was really clear (almost to me) that when two parties are in good
faith disputing for a name there is generally no problem.
When one of the parties is in 'bad faith' having such 'voluntary' arbitration is
not enough to avoid court litigation because one want to solve and the other
wants to steal...
When opening the '.it' registration to any european citizen as we did
(broadening the number of potential registrant that way ) a way to really
handle abusive registration HAD to be in place. I made any kind pressure for
having it as early as possible even by asking to postpone date for 'opening'.
I have been talked as a people that was not endorsing 'opening' to Europe.
A little bit later the history was on my side. Our fellow candidate Francesco
Ravanelli was a victim of this miss in the '.it' rules (as you may see on his
profile)
In summary, for those of you which are concerned with UDRP I really
suggest to take a look to the final WIPO report.
Maybe it will not change your idea but I may assure you
that you will not waste your time reading it.
Best Regards
Giorgio Griffini
(removing the Italian Naming Authority member hat now and restarting to
battle for endorsements... :)