Re: [ICANN-EU] BiGuB-Questionaire, results

[Christoph <cweber@dialup.nacamar.de>]

Hello,

Marc Lehmann wrote:
[quoting me]
> > I may have my reserves WRT Andy, but this kind of debate certainly marcs
> > a new low ... "let's slam him, no matter what for actually" .
> 
> I think the matter *is* very important 

Well, you didn't say so. You effectively said "the fact's don't matter
as long
as Andy gets bad Press. He deserves that anyway".

> if you think otherwise you are
> entitled to your opinion, but this is no reason to ignore the facts. 

You aren't, either. 
- mistake 1: Andy's site is perfectly accessible with a text mode
browser. 
  you apparently didn't bother checking
- mistake 2: These folks obviously even didn't know his site but refer
to
  the ccc web site. That whining about the poor fellas actually having
to
  click twice or install a certificate file into their browser is just 
  that - whining. The site even comes up without that fuss when accessed
  from lynx. Andreas asked about that - you just ignored the question.

> I am
> just emphasizing his actions, I do not repeat myself. And if you consider
> that slamming, then, well, you should face the reality.

You just repeated baseless accusations without checking. So much for
reality. 

Aside from that these folks are just fishing for free publicity. 
There is no logical connection beween Webb design for the 
handicapped and ICANN. I agree though he should have told them 
so in a polite email.

Regards

Christoph Weber-Fahr