[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ICANN-EU] Independent support for Jeanette Hofmann
- To: icann-europe@fitug.de
- Subject: Re: [ICANN-EU] Independent support for Jeanette Hofmann
- From: "F. Ravanelli" <ravanelli@ravanelli.com>
- Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 23:05:56 +0200
- Comment: This message comes from the icann-europe mailing list.
- In-Reply-To: <002701c00f89$ba5d8080$7e6ae33e@FRITZweb>
- References: <20000826174732.A2734@gmx.net>
- Sender: owner-icann-europe@fitug.de
Hello,
thanks for the abstract, Michael.
>Gegen seine Nominierung sprechen aus meiner Sicht jedoch zwei Argumente:
> Lutz Donnerhacke hat sich vor seiner Bewerbung nicht - politisch oder
>technisch - mit der ICANN auseinandergesetzt;
> sein Bewerbungstext ist in schlechtem Englisch verfaßt.
>Die gleichen Einwände gelten für die Bewerbungen von Andy Müller-Maguhn,
>padeluun und Rena Tangens.
Florian, I think it's better to say why Jeanette is right for us and not
why other candidates aren't good for ICANN. It's not kind and it's not a
cunning move: if other candidates are wrong, tell something that may show
what you think without say it; saying they aren't good (sincerily, I don't
care about this 'cause they can reply you and/or Jeanette with similar
campaigns), you say that the people who voted for them aren't clever, too;
it's not a good support for a candidate, even if politician often say bad
words on their enemies... As you may see, I'm not in a good place in the
"race", so I don't say this to tell ba things about Jeanette :-) One
advice: give a look at the date provided to support Jeanette...
Bye,
Francesco Ravanelli
www.ravanelli.com