[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ICANN-EU] ICANN endorsement period prolonged
- To: "Jeanette Hofmann" <jeanette@medea.wz-berlin.de>
- Subject: Re: [ICANN-EU] ICANN endorsement period prolonged
- From: "Andreas Fügner" <Andreas.Fuegner@lizenz.com>
- Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2000 20:14:08 +0200
- Cc: <icann-europe@fitug.de>
- Comment: This message comes from the icann-europe mailing list.
- Sender: owner-icann-europe@fitug.de
Dear Jeanette:
>I've noticed that many people appreciate ICANN's decision to extend
>the endorsement period. However, I still feel uncomfortable about this
>move.
It is a correction of a mistake. More needed!
>First, I hadn't seen any discussion about this issue anywhere. I
>was completely taken by surprise and my first thought was: once
>again one of those top-down decisions.
>Second, I don't like the idea of changing rules during the election
>process. I mean several suggestions have been made recently to
>improve the election procedure.
Are you unhappy about what they did, or more about how?
>And it's probably save to say that
>most of us agree that this has to wait until the election is completed.
Why? Do you think a mistake has to be continued 'till the end?
>So, what exactly justifies this exception? And who is allowed to judge
>between justified and not justified exceptions?
The board, as a team of decision makers exactly for cases like this,
where time is an issue.
>What do you think? Am I on the wrong track here?
Yes!