[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ICANN-EU] Questions for Alf Hansen and the other candidates



On Mon, 28 Aug 2000, Christoph wrote:

[...]
> Another thing that bothers me (but is maybe unfair to 
> ask - feel free to ignore it :-)):
> 
> - what do you think about the Concept of a nomination 
>   comitee ? Assumed - as many people suggest - that the 
>   Nomination Comittee did a Job that left ... ahem ...
>   ample room for improvement, what could be done to improve the
>   situation in the next round of At Large elections ?

There should be a different type of election. If we have the same sort of
thing again, there will probably be even more candidates, and certainly
more members. It is impossible for most people, maybe for anyone, to study
70 plus candidates. Also I do not like the one director for each continent
idea. It has too many of the bad things of the English political system.
Maybe an atlarge election of an atlarge council, which in turns elects
atlarge directors?

> - which of the issues at ICANN that are currently under discussion
>   should bother the new at large director most ? Why ?

Those who read what I wrote earlier, will expect: UDRP. No:
New gTLD's is the most important issue. It really needs a lot of wisdom to
avoid it becoming an utter failure. For those who are interested why I
think so:
http://www.abunde.net/indexold.html

--
Marc Schneiders ------- Venster - http://www.venster.nl 
 marc@venster.nl - marc@bijt.net - marc@schneiders.org