[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ICANN-EU] Article 31
- To: icann-europe@fitug.de
- Subject: Re: [ICANN-EU] Article 31
- From: "Erik Moeller" <moeller@scireview.de>
- Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 03:29:23 +0200
- Comment: This message comes from the icann-europe mailing list.
- In-reply-to: <009501c0108d$52f51340$3679a7c3@n8i4o4>
- Organization: Scientific Review Service
- Sender: owner-icann-europe@fitug.de
On 28 Aug 2000, at 4:13, Constantine S. Chassapis wrote:
> It is the duty of
> all local societies or countries, at start, and of the whole humanity
> next, to try to eradicate child porn.
Define it first. Is the picture of a nude 13-year-old with an
erection, smiling, CP? Is a photo a 17-year-old girl having sex with
a 21-year-old boy CP? The fist is CP by the German def., the second
is CP by the American def. By my def., both pictures are perfectly
normal and healthy and should, of course, be legal without any
restrictions on distribution whatsoever. What about violent pictures
where nobody was harmed, like the Japanese comics?
> I might as well add an A32 saying that child porn
> is illegal, is immoral, is disgusting, is inhuman, is ...
Of course we also need articles for copyright violations, bestiality,
normal pornography, bomb-making instructions, drug information, nazi
propaganda, leftist propaganda, evolution theory .. or an article
saying "Subversive speech is not protected" perhaps?
It's simple: No censorship at all (including no censorship of CP) or
censorship where the government decides what is allowed and what. Of
course, I prefer the former. Of course, the UN would never ratify
that (well, maybe in 2030).
Regards,
Erik
--
Scientific Reviewer, Freelancer, Humanist -- Berlin/Germany
Phone: +49-30-45491008 - Web: <http://www.humanist.de/erik>
The Origins of Peace and Violence: <http://www.violence.de>