[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ICANN-EU] Re: [icann-candidates] IPv6
- To: lutz@iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke)
- Subject: Re: [ICANN-EU] Re: [icann-candidates] IPv6
- From: Andreas Bogk <andreas@andreas.org>
- Date: 04 Sep 2000 22:28:52 +0200
- Cc: icann-europe@fitug.de
- Comment: This message comes from the icann-europe mailing list.
- In-Reply-To: lutz@iks-jena.de's message of "4 Sep 2000 16:08:31 GMT"
- References: <200009022118.VAA08192@dg8fz.ampr.org><m37l8s6v7a.fsf@soma.andreas.org><slrn8r7i7v.277.lutz@belenus.iks-jena.de>
- Sender: owner-icann-europe@fitug.de
- User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Capitol Reef)
lutz@iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke) writes:
> >Of course it will work. IPv6 contains intelligent network renumbering.
> >With IPv6, renumbering will become common practice.
> I hear your profund statement but I wonder if it will really work.
Autoconfiguration works fine, even with multiple IP addresses. The
setup we used to test was a Cisco as the router (which also announced
the address range), a Linux 2.2 and FreeBSD 4.0 with KAME.
I couldn't find the code that chooses which one of multiple addresses
to use. Prefixes announced by a router have a time to live, and the
kernel should choose the longer-living address over an equally suited,
but shorter TTL address for outgoing connections. This allows you to
change address space without breaking anything, without even having to
reboot anything. But I'm not sure Linux handles this properly yet.
Andreas
--
"Man kann gegen die Faschisten nicht mit den Mitteln des Faschismus
kämpfen, ohne genau die Werte zu verlieren, die man verteidigen
möchte."
-- Kristian Köhntopp über die Filterpläne der CDU