[ICANN-EU] 3:1 NO (NORWAY)

["JIM FLEMING" <jfleming@anet.com>]

Alf,

BTW....I assume that since IN-ADDR.NO is not in
use that you have restricted access to 3:1.x.x.x.x IPv8
address space allocations...is that correct ?

....or, can anyone FREELY obtain IN-ADDR.NO ?

$ dig in-addr.no any

; <<>> DiG 2.2 <<>> in-addr.no any
;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch
;; got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 6
;; flags: qr aa rd ra; Ques: 1, Ans: 0, Auth: 1, Addit: 0
;; QUESTIONS:
;;      in-addr.no, type = ANY, class = IN

;; AUTHORITY RECORDS:
no.     86400   SOA     ask.norid.no. hostmaster.uninett.no. (
                        2000090864      ; serial
                        3600    ; refresh (1 hour)
                        1800    ; retry (30 mins)
                        604800  ; expire (7 days)
                        86400 ) ; minimum (1 day)



Jim Fleming
http://www.unir.com/images/architech.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/address.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/headers.gif
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
http://msdn.microsoft.com/downloads/sdks/platform/tpipv6/start.asp



----- Original Message -----
From: Alf Hansen <aha@uninett.no>
To: JIM FLEMING <jfleming@anet.com>
Cc: icann-europe <icann-europe@fitug.de>
Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2000 4:36 AM
Subject: Re: [ICANN-EU] ICANN Q&A Forum


> Jim,
>
> Short answers:
>
> JIM FLEMING wrote:
> >
> > http://domen.uninett.no/fas/ICANN/aha-candidate-web-page.html
> >
> > My ICANN Candidate Web Page, Alf Hansen
> >
> > "I have seen ICANN develop. My motivation is based on my strong believe
that
> > there is a need for some minimum stable, central coordination of the
global
> > Internet. I am afraid that the basic Internet idea of one, global
> > interconnected infrastructure, may fall apart. My background and
experience
> > makes me qualified to contribute to keep the real Internet alive."
> >
> > @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
> >
> > Can you define "the real Internet" ?
>
> No, but I mean "Internet as we know it as a collaboration between
> thousands of network operators, following some accepted rules."
>
> >
> > Are you aware that the Internet is designed to avoid the need for
"central
> > coordination" ?
>
> Yes.  But still there is a need for some minimum coordination of names
> and addresses.
>
> >
> > Also, are you aware that the Internet "routes around damage"....such as
> > ICANN ?
>
> Please explain. I have not heared that expression before.
>
> >
> > Lastly, can you explain how the "Floating Root" works ?
>
> The term "Floating root" is not well known to me for the moment.
>
> >
> > Jim Fleming
> > http://www.unir.com/images/architech.gif
> > http://www.unir.com/images/address.gif
> > http://www.unir.com/images/headers.gif
> > http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
> > http://msdn.microsoft.com/downloads/sdks/platform/tpipv6/start.asp
> >
>
> What I am trying to say is that the technical architecture of The
> Internet, including the address space, should continue to maintain a
> fully interconnected Internet.
>
> Best regards,
> Alf H
>