Re: [ICANN-EU] How to proceed

[Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>]

On 2000-10-11 10:15:19 +0200, Andy Mueller-Maguhn wrote:

> agreed. Next to my offer of some more mailing-lists for generall
> discussion to structure the discussion a little more, 

In order to get this structure into discussions, you should give a
much more precise indication of what kind of traffic you expect to
see on icann-debate.  Right now, there's a danger of duplication of
icann-europe.

> networking of the ALM directors is a good idea. 

Yes.

> I think the prioritys should be to get to an informel network of
> european user organisations (people from ISOCīs etc.) looking at
> the november-meeting, and structure the stuff we have to adress
> there.

While this is most likely efficient, please make sure that you
deliver the transparency you have been promising during the vote.

Closed-door meetings and "CC lists" are certainly not the way to
achieve this.  Please make sure there is a public account of the
contents of these meetings.

> Definitely. I would prefer a more informel structure and already
> have scedulled some meetings with european user groups. Iīll
> invite them to participate here and in the mailing-lists
> mentioned in the other mail.

Good.

> Iīll also put my scedule online soon to better possibilities of
> RL-coordination; old (german) version is at
> https://www.ccc.de/~andy/Termine/

Thanks. I notice that you're about to have a discussion round on
ICANN at the Federal Ministry for Econonmics and Technology
tomorrow.

Could you possibly tell us a bit more about the participants and
agenda of this discussion round?

-- 
Thomas Roessler                         <roessler@does-not-exist.org>