[ICANN-EU] LA @large meeting preparation

[Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>]

To all.
This list is obviously the kernel of the @large European constituency,
and probably of the whole @large constituency as press reports that
Thomas' and Hugo's ML has taken the lead.

Thomas has established the charter for the ML. I think we have now
to list all the issues we would like the LA meeting to address in term
of the @large constituency.

I would contribute with a few points, so you may add yours and our
representatives in LA and the ICANN could have a good picture of what
we want to achieve.

-  access to the @large people in being able to mail them on an
    European and national basis,

-  election of the 4 other @large Directors on a worldwide basis
    in the shortest delays.

-  links on the ICANN site to the @large regional and national sites

-  no formal organization of the @large constituencies, each national
    regional, specialized group creating its own solutions.

-  designation in the ICANN of an @large secretary to help the @large
    Members in relating with the ICANN. Netiquette addition: everyone
    must be fair and polite with this secretariat and *never* flame it. But
    this secretariat must never try to impose anything on any Member.
    Any attempt will result with the information of the @large directors.

-  the @large constituency should be permanently polled about the
    ICANN orientations for rough consensus based actions. This
    should result in a polling program being maintained by the ICANN.
    Any question being seconded by 100 Members should be documented
    and listed there. This polling should be permanent: people should be
    able to change their vote.

-  the PIN system should be totally reset. Every @large member should
    be given the opportunity to confirm his desire to participate and to
    update his address. PINs should be mailed the same way as NSI DN
    bills (it works very nicely). The polling system would be a permanent
    check of the way the PIN system works.

I suggest you keep adding your suggestions. Then we could set up
priorities.

NB: this *only* concerns @large setup issues. Not what the @large
Members may think of other topics.

Regards.
Jefsey

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ICANN, the "50.000 bucks + 101 bugs = Error 50101" consortium
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------