[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [icann-eu] LAST CALL: Study Committee Comments.
- To: Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>
- Subject: Re: [icann-eu] LAST CALL: Study Committee Comments.
- From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
- Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 09:45:31 +0100
- Cc: icann-europe@fitug.de
- Comment: This message comes from the icann-europe mailing list.
- In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.0.20001205001700.00aec140@pop.wanadoo.fr>; from jefsey@wanadoo.fr on Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 12:17:14AM +0100
- Mail-Followup-To: Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>, icann-europe@fitug.de
- References: <5.0.2.1.0.20001205001700.00aec140@pop.wanadoo.fr>
- Sender: owner-icann-europe@fitug.de
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i
On 2000-12-05 00:17:14 +0100, Jefsey Morfin wrote:
>>All that's quite nice, but does it really need to be specified
>>in this great detail? I don't think so.
> as you say: Ups..! you want people to vote but do not care about
> who and how much they will be: 17000 Germans or billions of
> Indians and Chineses. Will they be active, existing, potential
> users? stakeholders? Free or paying Members. If paying, how much?
> depending on the country? Will the amount be related to the rates
> described by Staff in its proposition to TLDs.
As I said, these questions are nice, and important - but in my mind,
it's evident that they are already covered by the current set of
questions.
--
Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>