[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [icann-europe] Recommended Reading: Brad Templeton on ICANN and the DNS
- To: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
- Subject: Re: [icann-europe] Recommended Reading: Brad Templeton on ICANN and the DNS
- From: Brad Templeton <brad@templetons.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 11:31:35 -0700
- Cc: Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>,icann-europe@lists.fitug.de, bt@templetons.com
- Delivered-To: icann-europe@angua.rince.de
- Delivered-To: mailing list icann-europe@lists.fitug.de
- Delivered-To: moderator for icann-europe@lists.fitug.de
- In-Reply-To: <3B4D8985.1C268C95@ix.netcom.com>; from jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com on Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 04:27:01AM -0700
- List-Help: <mailto:icann-europe-help@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Id: <icann-europe.lists.fitug.de>
- List-Post: <mailto:icann-europe@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:icann-europe-subscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:icann-europe-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- Mailing-List: contact icann-europe-help@lists.fitug.de; run by ezmlm
- Organization: http://www.templetons.com/brad
- References: <20010712103633.A15624@sobolev.does-not-exist.org> <3B4D8985.1C268C95@ix.netcom.com>
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 04:27:01AM -0700, Jeff Williams wrote:
> Thomas, Brad and all,
>
> The ICANN experiment is failing. It can be seen every day, all over
> the globe, not just in the DNS either. IP addressing and protocol
> development
> and deployment have some stark examples. Brad's ideas regarding
> replacing ICANN have been underway in earnest for a little bit longer
> than a year now. New.net is just one example of such that has gained
> some recognition and notice. Other organizations and technology have
> been quietly gaining recognition such as SROOTS, and BINDPlus
> throughout several areas of the international community.
Indeed, I am aware of these, but my point is that it is an error to
simply replace one set of monopolies on generic terms with another.
That's what new.net and most others I have seen wish to do.
A meaningful replacement, taking its queue from trademark law, gives
those monopolies to no party. ICANN had good people in it, but
fell prey to powerful special interests. A replacement org will do
the same.
Indeed, but there's no truly global law. In the past making a trademark
global has been a course available only to the most giant corporations.
Oddly, ".com" for a while seemed to replace the trademark registries as
the desired way to reserve a name. Companies were far more concerned,
in naming products and companies, that the .com domain be available than
that a TM search go well.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: icann-europe-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: icann-europe-help@lists.fitug.de