[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [icann-europe] Recommended Reading: Brad Templeton on ICANN and the DNS
- To: Brad Templeton <brad@templetons.com>
- Subject: Re: [icann-europe] Recommended Reading: Brad Templeton on ICANN and the DNS
- From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 14:45:15 -0700
- Cc: Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>,icann-europe@lists.fitug.de, bt@templetons.com
- Delivered-To: icann-europe@angua.rince.de
- Delivered-To: mailing list icann-europe@lists.fitug.de
- List-Help: <mailto:icann-europe-help@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Id: <icann-europe.lists.fitug.de>
- List-Post: <mailto:icann-europe@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:icann-europe-subscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:icann-europe-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- Mailing-List: contact icann-europe-help@lists.fitug.de; run by ezmlm
- Organization: INEGroup Spokesman
- References: <20010712103633.A15624@sobolev.does-not-exist.org> <3B4D8985.1C268C95@ix.netcom.com> <20010712113135.B24567@main.templetons.com>
Brad and all,
Brad Templeton wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 04:27:01AM -0700, Jeff Williams wrote:
> > Thomas, Brad and all,
> >
> > The ICANN experiment is failing. It can be seen every day, all over
> > the globe, not just in the DNS either. IP addressing and protocol
> > development
> > and deployment have some stark examples. Brad's ideas regarding
> > replacing ICANN have been underway in earnest for a little bit longer
> > than a year now. New.net is just one example of such that has gained
> > some recognition and notice. Other organizations and technology have
> > been quietly gaining recognition such as SROOTS, and BINDPlus
> > throughout several areas of the international community.
>
> Indeed, I am aware of these, but my point is that it is an error to
> simply replace one set of monopolies on generic terms with another.
> That's what new.net and most others I have seen wish to do.
Well from what I can see New.net's TLD's are not generic for the
most part. Yes they do have a few that are. But the majority are not.
However TLD's are not trademarkable as aren't generic terms.
>
>
> A meaningful replacement, taking its queue from trademark law, gives
> those monopolies to no party. ICANN had good people in it, but
> fell prey to powerful special interests. A replacement org will do
> the same.
THe ICANN Interim BoD and the subsequent BoD's to follow were made
up mostly of special interests folks or corporate interests folks... This
still remains true.
>
>
> Indeed, but there's no truly global law. In the past making a trademark
> global has been a course available only to the most giant corporations.
True to an extent.
>
> Oddly, ".com" for a while seemed to replace the trademark registries as
> the desired way to reserve a name. Companies were far more concerned,
> in naming products and companies, that the .com domain be available than
> that a TM search go well.
>;) Yes this is certainly true...
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: icann-europe-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: icann-europe-help@lists.fitug.de