[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[atlarge-discuss] ALOC Representation needs accompanying mission statement
- To: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: [atlarge-discuss] ALOC Representation needs accompanying mission statement
- From: "Richard Henderson" <email@example.com>
- Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 16:58:48 +0100
- Cc: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Delivered-To: mailing list email@example.com
- List-Help: <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>
- List-Post: <mailto:email@example.com>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:email@example.com>
- Mailing-List: contact firstname.lastname@example.org; run by ezmlm
HelpWith regard to ALOC:
We SHOULD be represented (because it is a right of the people), but I agree with Vittorio that our representatives should take a clear statement with them, that
(a) they are wholly independent of ICANN
(b) critical of ICANN - sorry, but there's no point in appeasement
(c) we have minimum requirements and expectations (including the election of a significant part of the ICANN board by an ALSO membership recognised by ICANN but independent of it.
I DO NOT favour ICANN financing, however, as that automatically creates a link and dependency, and a 'suspicion of association' with ICANN.
You do not ask a burglar to pay for your house insurance.
First though, as Wolfgang states, we cannot be represented there without a clear mission statement. And I think this could be a little problematic, as I suspect that within our own group there are those who favour a narrow ICANN-related mission, and those like myself who favour a broader mission, aimed at a larger audience and membership.
The structure or architecture for discussion of this urgent matter, and the bylaws, and the name, and the elections, should be set in place this weekend - so that discussion among members can commence immediately in a clear and orderly manner.
I propose separate threads or forum sub-sections for different issues (including a breaking up of bylaws issues into ten or more sections as I detailed a week ago).
Some people may argue that we need to proceed step-by-step.
I believe we should initiate discussion in this structured way immediately.