[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [atlarge-discuss] Re: Bucharest Follow up- Formation of a Virtual Association-GAFIG



On Fri, 05 Jul 2002 01:58:20 -0400, you wrote:

>How do the members of icannatlarge.com feel about funding
>ICANN?  Please speak up and let your voice be heard.  I
>will relay to the ALOC any feedback, concerns and/or
>messages our members may have on this issue.

I simply think that each of us is free to decide whether they want to fund
Denise's work or not. Personally, I think that accounting of such funds
should be given at least to those who donated them - and that, anyway, I
wouldn't fund any effort before getting sure of how the money will be spent
and how it has been spent in the past. And I still can't understand why
Denise's work can't be funded by ICANN itself.

And if you read the charter the panel approved (and I wrote ;-) ) for our
participation in the ALOC, we explicitly stated that any agreement between
ICANN and the "At Large Structures" (or however you might want to call them)
should not require such structures to fund ICANN.
-- 
.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo vb.
Vittorio Bertola     <vb@vitaminic.net>    Ph. +39 011 23381220
Vitaminic [The Music Evolution] - Vice President for Technology

DISCLAIMER, PLEASE NOTE: This communication is intended only for use by the
addressee. It may contain confidential or privileged information. 
Transmission, distribution and/or copy cannot be permitted. Please notify
immediately the sender by replying if you are not the intended recipient.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de