[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [atlarge-discuss] SECONDS and NOMINATIONS

Well..

this is real neccesary mail.

I don't like any kind of problems.

1. In LatinAmerica all work in all ways, we are little group, and need to 
be bigger, but now we are only a few.

2. I don't accept my nomination (If you see some mail in this way, please 
forward)

3. If somebody think i'm a right-person for one possition is his-view, is 
necessary that i'm agree with this.

4. Please don't confuse a nomination with a election, and don't confuse 
nomination with the acception of this nomination.

5. And... never in the past i see so much email with my name  and is Erick 
Iriarte Ahon (complete)  :) Thanks...

Erick Iriarte Ahon
Latinoamericann Project

Pd. i refresf my suggest, if somebody nominate Danny i support the nomination.

At 09:19 a.m. 16/07/2002 -0400, DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:
>Dear Erick,
>
>The entire point of an At-Large was to ensure representation for those not
>already represented by the supporting organizations.
>
>You are already an elected representative of the Non-Commercial Constituency
>serving as their representative on the Names Council.  One such
>representative job is enough, isn't it?  Just do a good job on the Council
>and allow others to represent the unrepresented user community.  You don't
>need two such representative positions simultaneously.
>
>PS.  I haven't spent my time researching your life... but I have followed the
>issue of "transfers" rather closely (which allows me to be aware of the
>degree of your involvement in the TF efforts).   My concern is that
>candidates for office in the at-large demonstrate a level of concern about
>user "issues"... after all, we are here to make sure that policy concerns and
>problems encountered by the user community are resolved.
>
>I don't need a slate of candidates that already operate within the sphere of
>the Non-Commercial Constituency.  They already have a forum within which they
>can raise their concerns.  The At-Large should not become merely a new
>platform for the NCDNHC and their members -- such action will only serve to
>destroy whatever credibility this organization seeks to build...


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de