[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[atlarge-discuss] Questions for any and all ICANNATLARGE.COM election Candidates - First Round



My fellow stakeholders, candidates and other interested parties,

  The following are some question that as a candidate I have
for my fellow candidates:

NOTE:  Please try to be brief, direct and to the point yet
             complete in your answers...

1.) What in your opinion, specifically, does the ICANNATLARGE.COM
     membership stand for?

2.) Are there any principals that the ICANNATLARGE.COM
      members can expect form you as a candidate?  What are they?

3.) Does in your opinion as a candidate, the membership work for
     you if elected, or do you serve the membership?

4.) How do you determine for a relative certanty, what the membership
     Consensus is on any particular issue that may be considered as a
     "Best Practice" or Policy to/from either ICANN, or should ICANN
     as it is today not survive, any other replacing entity?

5.) Do you believe that members of ICANNATLARGE.COM should
      have a vote in issues or pending policies that effect them
directly
      or indirectly before they are implemented?

6.) What should the makeup of the ICANNATLARGE.COM
     representatives be from a geographical perspective?  Or
     is geographical diversity a necessity?

7.) What as a candidate or if elected do you intend to do yourself
     with respect to outreach?

8.) What as a candidate or if elected, be willing to go door to door
      to find and recruit new members and funding for ICANNATLARGE.COM?

9.) How do you as a candidate view the best structure for
     ICANNATLARGE.COM?  Is this in your opinion very
     important, somewhat important, or of minor importance,
     and why?

10.)  What do you as a candidate, and in your opinion is the
        best possible method of funding and/or funding model for
        ICANNATLARGE.COM?

11.) Do you as a candidate and/or possible elected representative
       believe that ICANNATLARGE.COM should and/or needs
       to interface/work with governments/ government entities, and
       how do you propose this could best be accomplished?  Should the
       members have to approve such a method(s) via a referendum
       vote or by "rough consensus" in your opinion?

12.) What privacy protections for members/stakeholders/users or
       future members of ICANNATLARGE.COM do you believe
       as a candidate are relevant and minimum?  Should members
       or future members have the right of review or OptOut and
       opt-in?  Should members or future members of ICANNATLARGE.COM
       vote on such an issue?

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 124k members/stakeholders strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de