Re: [atlarge-discuss] Questions for any and all ICANNATLARGE.COM election Candidates - First Round

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Cordly and all stakeholders or orthe interested parties,

  Thank you for you answers to these questions Cordly.  However
you eithe neglected for some reason to respond to the other
At-Large list members these answers.  So I am taking the liberty
to do so here in this brief response...

  BTW, you might want to check your formating as well...
Thank you again! >:)

l.corazon wrote:

> Jeff William's wrote:
>
> > My fellow stakeholders, candidates and other interested parties,
> >
> >   The following are some question that as a candidate I have
> > for my fellow candidates:
> >
> > NOTE:  Please try to be brief, direct and to the point yet
> >              complete in your answers...
> >
> > 1.) What in your opinion, specifically, does the ICANNATLARGE.COM
> >      membership stand for? Transparency and fairness in managing the
> > assignment of domain names
> >
> > 2.) Are there any principals that the ICANNATLARGE.COM
> >       members can expect form you as a candidate? of  course  What are
> > they?

> I will work for the benefit of those seeking access without favour
> > to those who feel they own the space. If I am slacking, inflating my ego
> > or acting in an inauthentic manner I would resign immediately.
> >
> > 3.) Does in your opinion as a candidate, the membership work for
> >      you if elected, or do you serve the membership?

> > I would attempt to
> > be the servant of my fellow stakeholders
> >
> > 4.) How do you determine for a relative certainty, what the membership
> >      Consensus is on any particular issue that may be considered as a
> >      "Best Practice" or Policy to/from either ICANN, or should ICANN
> >      as it is today not survive, any other replacing entity?

> > I am interested in the truth not consensus getting the task done in a
> timely
> > fashion is the goal. Consensus is a tool and a good one but it can halt
> > all progress in the hands of people of ill will. I take the Putney Swope
> > view of what must happen for ICANN to survive.
> >
> > 5.) Do you believe that members of ICANNATLARGE.COM should
> >       have a vote in issues or pending policies that effect them
> > directly or indirectly before they are implemented?

> > We must work with hands on  directly we have a great responsibility to the
> > > > stakeholders. We must learn from our actions.

> > 6.) What should the makeup of the ICANNATLARGE.COM
> >      representatives be from a geographical perspective?

> > I think that  place is everything, the people must be encouraged to come

> > Or  is geographical diversity a necessity?

> > We hope so.
> >
> > 7.) What as a candidate or if elected do you intend to do yourself
> >      with respect to outreach?

> > Put ICANN back on track and the people will come.
> >
> > 8.) What as a candidate or if elected, be willing to go door to door
> >       to find and recruit new members and funding for ICANNATLARGE.COM?

>
> > There are people better at funding than I am. Finding the tools to fund
> > raise is another matter. Door to door in Simla, Colorado would be as
> > effective as door to door in Simla, India we are very third world.
> >
> > 9.) How do you as a candidate view the best structure for
> >      ICANNATLARGE.COM?
> >      important, somewhat important, or of minor importance,
> >      and why?

> This is a new group of people who know each other
> pretty well. My option has been taken very seriously by some and
> discounted by others. What is good is that this changes with issues. Is
> this in your opinion very

>
> >
> > 10.)  What do you as a candidate, and in your opinion is the
> >         best possible method of funding and/or funding model for
> >         ICANNATLARGE.COM?

> > Find an honest professional fund raiser and have
> > them held under strict accountility all book and deals must be open and a
> > fund raiser must be subject to quick recall by the membership.
> >
> > 11.) Do you as a candidate and/or possible elected representative
> >        believe that ICANNATLARGE.COM should and/or needs
> >        to interface/work with governments/ government entities, and
> >        how do you propose this could best be accomplished?  Should the
> >        members have to approve such a method(s) via a referendum
> >        vote or by "rough consensus" in your opinion?

> > We must work with
> > all governments that approach us. We must develop a protocol to deal with
> > them fairly. We must remember that fund raising and government contacts
> > are nodes of corruption. Fish rots from the head as do organizations and
> > boards. We must avoid toxic board syndrome Pacifica Radio had a toffee
> > pull over that. Clintionites took over the Pacifica board and attempted
> > to dismantle the Corporation. Recall by the membership is the answer to
> > that problem.
> >
> > 12.) What privacy protections for members/stakeholders/users or
> >        future members of ICANNATLARGE.COM do you believe
> >        as a candidate are relevant and minimum?  Should members
> >        or future members have the right of review or OptOut and
> >        opt-in?  Should members or future members of ICANNATLARGE.COM
> >        vote on such an issue?

> > I think that there will be a hashing out of
> > privacy protection and am looking forward to seeing others views on this.
> > When an issue is dealt with clearly and thoroughly it rarely comes back.
> > This one will be a franckenissue, never really dying.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > --
> > Jeffrey A. Williams
> > Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 124k members/stakeholders strong!)
> > CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> > Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> > E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
> > Contact Number:  972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
> > Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> > For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de

Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 124k members/stakeholders strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de