[Fwd: Re: [atlarge-discuss] Questions for any and all ICANNATLARGE.COM election Candidates - First Round]

["l.corazon" <l.corazon@prodigy.net>]

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] Questions for any and all
ICANNATLARGE.COM election Candidates - First Round
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 00:06:01 -0600
From: "l.corazon" <l.corazon@prodigy.net>
To: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
References: <3D37B653.80B4BEC7@ix.netcom.com>

Jeff William's wrote:

> My fellow stakeholders, candidates and other interested parties,
>
>   The following are some question that as a candidate I have
> for my fellow candidates:
>
> NOTE:  Please try to be brief, direct and to the point yet
>              complete in your answers...
>
> 1.) What in your opinion, specifically, does the ICANNATLARGE.COM
>      membership stand for? Transparency and fairness in managing the
> assignment of domain names
>
> 2.) Are there any principals that the ICANNATLARGE.COM
>       members can expect form you as a candidate? of  course  What are
> they? I will work for the benefit of those seeking access without favour
> to those who feel they own the space. If I am slacking, inflating my ego
> or acting in an inauthentic manner I would resign immediately.
>
> 3.) Does in your opinion as a candidate, the membership work for
>      you if elected, or do you serve the membership? I would attempt to
> be the servant of my fellow stakeholders
>
> 4.) How do you determine for a relative certainty, what the membership
>      Consensus is on any particular issue that may be considered as a
>      "Best Practice" or Policy to/from either ICANN, or should ICANN
>      as it is today not survive, any other replacing entity? I am
> interested in the truth not consensus getting the task done in a timely
> fashion is the goal. Consensus is a tool and a good one but it can halt
> all progress in the hands of people of ill will. I take the Putney Swope
> view of what must happen for ICANN to survive.
>
> 5.) Do you believe that members of ICANNATLARGE.COM should
>       have a vote in issues or pending policies that effect them
> directly
>       or indirectly before they are implemented? We must work with hands
> on  directly we have a great responsibility to the stakeholders. We must
> learn from our actions.
>
> 6.) What should the makeup of the ICANNATLARGE.COM
>      representatives be from a geographical perspective? I think that
> place is everything, the people must be encouraged to come  Or
>      is geographical diversity a necessity? We hope so.
>
> 7.) What as a candidate or if elected do you intend to do yourself
>      with respect to outreach? Put ICANN back on track and the people
> will come.
>
> 8.) What as a candidate or if elected, be willing to go door to door
>       to find and recruit new members and funding for ICANNATLARGE.COM?
> There are people better at funding than I am. Finding the tools to fund
> raise is another matter. Door to door in Simla, Colorado would be as
> effective as door to door in Simla, India we are very third world.
>
> 9.) How do you as a candidate view the best structure for
>      ICANNATLARGE.COM? This is a new group of people who know each other
> pretty well. My option has been taken very seriously by some and
> discounted by others. What is good is that this changes with issues. Is
> this in your opinion very
>      important, somewhat important, or of minor importance,
>      and why?
>
> 10.)  What do you as a candidate, and in your opinion is the
>         best possible method of funding and/or funding model for
>         ICANNATLARGE.COM?Find an honest professional fund raiser and have
> them held under strict accountility all book and deals must be open and a
> fund raiser must be subject to quick recall by the membership.
>
> 11.) Do you as a candidate and/or possible elected representative
>        believe that ICANNATLARGE.COM should and/or needs
>        to interface/work with governments/ government entities, and
>        how do you propose this could best be accomplished?  Should the
>        members have to approve such a method(s) via a referendum
>        vote or by "rough consensus" in your opinion? We must work with
> all governments that approach us. We must develop a protocol to deal with
> them fairly. We must remember that fund raising and government contacts
> are nodes of corruption. Fish rots from the head as do organizations and
> boards. We must avoid toxic board syndrome Pacifica Radio had a toffee
> pull over that. Clintionites took over the Pacifica board and attempted
> to dismantle the Corporation. Recall by the membership is the answer to
> that problem.
>
> 12.) What privacy protections for members/stakeholders/users or
>        future members of ICANNATLARGE.COM do you believe
>        as a candidate are relevant and minimum?  Should members
>        or future members have the right of review or OptOut and
>        opt-in?  Should members or future members of ICANNATLARGE.COM
>        vote on such an issue? I think that there will be a hashing out of
> privacy protection and am looking forward to seeing others views on this.
> When an issue is dealt with clearly and thoroughly it rarely comes back.
> This one will be a franckenissue, never really dying.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Jeffrey A. Williams
> Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 124k members/stakeholders strong!)
> CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
> Contact Number:  972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
> Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de