[atlarge-discuss] FW: 003 WG-ICANN NomCom representative

[Joanna Lane <jo-uk@rcn.com>]

FYI

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joanna Lane [mailto:jo-uk@rcn.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 4:06 PM
> To: At Large Panel; DannyYounger@cs.com
> Cc: apisan@servidor.unam.mx; metalitz@iipa.com
> Subject: 003 WG-ICANN NomCom representative
>
>
> From the GA list:-
>
> > Steve Metalitz, in providing the "IPC Response to ALAC Assistance Group
> > Report", makes the following comment in one of the footnotes:
> >
> > "The report seems to suggest that a regional at-large structure
> > with as few
> > as 200 individual members could be accredited to exercise
> > responsibilities
> > including direct appointment of a member of the Nominating
> > Committee.  This
> > number appears far too low to justify a claim of
> > representativeness of the
> > range of "individual Internet users" from any region, and
> certainly from
> > regions in which there are tens or hundreds of millions of such
> Internet
> > users."
> > http://forum.icann.org/reform-comments/alacag/pdf00000.pdf
>
> Since I was CC'd on this exchange between Danny and Steve, I can
> only assume it was to bring to my attention the fact that our
> organization, ICANNAtLarge, with over 1000 individuals
> registered, has now met the ICANN test of 200+ members in at
> least some of the regions.
>
> By ICANN's own policies therefore, we could apply to be
> accredited and exercise responsibilities in relation to
> appointing a member of ICANN's NomCom.
>
> Who will take the lead on this?
>
> With thanks to Danny.
> Joanna


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de