Re: [atlarge-discuss] Our New Name Isn't...

[Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>]

At 09:56 p.m. 3/10/2002 +0000, David Farrar wrote:

> What I think we need to concentrate on is how to minimise the time that ALAC
> spends as board appointed to being bottom up appointed.  There is no doubt 
> with
> 1,000 members we are in the best position to lead the charge here.
Agreed.


> Another issue worth looking at is whether we should form a sub grouping of
> members who are domain name holders and petition for recognition as a GNSO
> constituency.
> I believe that the grounds which IDNO got rejected on would not
> apply here and that this organisation offers the best chance of getting an
> individual registrants voice in the GNSO.
Not disagreeing with the suggestion, can you please enlighten us on what " 
grounds which IDNO got rejected on "?
As such denial of our petition was never officially made, this is something 
I have forever been trying  to find out from the Board and if you know the 
answer it would be very useful to let the members here know.

--Joop


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de