[atlarge-discuss] Re: [atlarge-panel] Re: WG-DNS name protection and management

["Richard Henderson" <richardhenderson@ntlworld.com>]

I agree with Jefsey - we should consider using www.atlarge.org as the
structural base for our organisation - we should approach Marc Schneiders
and explain this to him - we should ask him if he would be prepared to
transfer this second name to our control - we should have the name
registered to "Icannatlarge.org" and "Hans Klein" as acting chair - we
should do this with all urgency -

My friends, not only is this the obvious and intuitive way to construct the
web presence of our organisation, it is also an essential fallback for the
time which will surely come, when ICANN gets dumped. We should act now in my
opinion. There may be uncertain times ahead.

The name of our organisation has been decided, but the fundamental structure
of our web presence should be built around www.atlarge.org

Richard

----- Original Message -----
From: J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin <jefsey@club-internet.fr>
To: James Love <james.love@cptech.org>
Cc: <richardhenderson@ntlworld.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 9:06 PM
Subject: Re: [atlarge-panel] Re: WG-DNS name protection and management


> On 15:57 13/10/02, James Love said:
> >Why a separate WG for DNS?   Is this like a separate WG for a phone
number
> >of something?     Marc is willing to transfer the name, but to who?
That
> >isn't a technical issue, it is a legal issue.    We need to solve the
> >legal issues.  But framing this as a DNS issue is having the tail wag the
dog.
> >Jamie
>
> The legal issue is necessary but is a detail. What is important is speed.
>
> You can decide to kill that orgaization's possibilties in attaching the
> name to the Web site only, or to permit it to develop in attaching it to
> the WG-DNS. Please read Richard. I am too buzy to disput that if you do
not
> understand it.
>
> The web site is about document and pages and the emiotionals of
> Joanna/SS/Joop etc. You are good at taking care of that. Please do it.
>
> The DNS is about structure of the organization, thousands of web sites and
> our capacity as at large to take the Internet or not. I have 200 websites
> to distribute ready, that all this blocks....
>
> You can continue confusing Marc about it, you can delay the @large. I will
> not fight you anymore than ICANN. You do not realize it but you do the
same
> smokescreening over God knows what reason. You dramatically blocks us all.
> Do as you like. I am too tired.
>
> Get Richard or others explain you. We are wasting crucial time. As you may
> know there are a few thngs going on in the world, named ICANN, GWBush,
> Richard Clarke, NSI, ITU, Iraq, etc... We had plenty of time. Joanna and
> now this .  Why ... why ... what is the benefit for you ? I just do not
> understand ...
>
> If I have not a green light to transfer atlarge.org and icannatlarge.org
to
> a legal structure formed by the panel this week, so we may start
> developping local and specialized sites and an @large real namespace, I
> give up. What did we achive in all this months we could have done in three
> days ????
>
> Again, sorry at being upset, but this kills me.
> jfc
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de