[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [atlarge-discuss] Re: Nothing Special :Re: [atlarge-discuss] FYI: [CNET] ICANN under Twomey to continuepolicy focus
Jeff Williams schrieb:
>
> Holger and all fellow members,
>
> Holger Steiner wrote:
>
> > Jeff Williams schrieb:
> > >
> > > Holger and all fellow members,
> > >
> > > Holger Steiner wrote:
> > >
> > > > Jeff Williams schrieb:
> > > > >
> > > > > Holger and all fellow members,
> > > > >
> > > > > Holger Steiner wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Jeff Williams schrieb:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Holger and all fellow members,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Holger Steiner wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Jeff Williams schrieb:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Holger and all fellow members,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Holger Steiner wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Jeff Williams schrieb:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Holger and all fellow members,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Changing the subject again...
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > You are not a long time user in the internet community, are you?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Yes. I am one of several original developers of ARPA net...
> > > > > > > > > Long enough for you?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Obviously not long enough for you to pick some things up.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Such as, prey tell?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Not to change the subject of a thread by your whim and not to use the
> > > > > > name of your discussion partners in the subject.
> > > > > > Just for example.
> > > > >
> > > > > Bad examples Holger. I changed the subject line as appropriate to
> > > > > the change or drift of the subject content/matter. Hence "Whim"
> > > > > played no part in that change of subject line.
> > > >
> > > > Yes it did.
> > >
> > > Sorry, but you are sadly mistaken. However I will be happy to
> > > meet you and/or your legal representatives in a court of law
> > > that is appropriate, to invite you to prove such... So I await
> > > your service. Otherwise your response above is just so much
> > > nonsense.
> >
> > You want to go to court about simple netiquette?
>
> No. ANd I never suggested such. I OFFERED you the opportunity
> to do so and to make good on your contention. Do you have a reading
> impairment problem? It seems so.
You invited me to meet me and my legal representatives in a court
of law.
I think you have a writing impairment problem.
It seems so.
> > You are some kind of newbie, arent you?
>
> Hardly! ROFLMAO!
You behave like one.
> > > > And not to forget placing my name in the subject line.
> > >
> > > I don't forget that at all. In fact, I would do so again if I
> > > believe it is appropriate.
> >
> > That is never appropriate.
>
> Incorrect. And if you think it is, prove it.
Never heard of Netiquette?
But you invented the Internet.
Let me guess, you are Al Gore?
> > Even a texan should know simple things like that.
>
> Simple things like what? Simple things??!!
Okay, I give you that.
Simple rules of behaving in public might not be simple for you.
> > > > > > > If so, Why on earth, given your recent
> > > > > > > remarks in this and other public exchanges with me would you
> > > > > > > want to?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What does your misunderstanding of economics have to do with my possible
> > > > > > membership in INEGroup?
> > > > >
> > > > > I have no misunderstanding of economics.
> > > >
> > > > Yes. You tried to refute theories about economics with social diseases.
> > >
> > > No I said that those effected by social diseases theories are of
> > > questionable value as those social diseases effect the mind in
> > > many ways that effect judgment, ect.
> >
> > This sentence does not parse.
>
> Sure does Holger. However I am again gathering that your command
> of the english language is less than optimal. However as perhaps
> you are not a native english speaker, that is somewhat understandable.
I am not a native english speaker.
Nevertheless is your sentence above a wrong use of english.
Please read it again.
It that doesnt help, read it loud.
> > You tried to judge a economic theory by painting Adam Smith as a
> > madman.
>
> He died a mad man.
And that proves exactly what?
> > You dont know jack about it, isnt it?
>
> This sentence is not constructed correctly. However I will
> attempt to decipher it:
> I know many fellows named Jack. I don't know what "it" you
> are referring to here however. I have read allot regarding the
> history of Adam Smith. Much is also available online regarding
> Adam Smith as also. My personal library is rather extensive.
Then try to read it sometimes.
> > > > > > > However as is my mandate,
> > > > > > > I shall forward your question on to the regional director for
> > > > > > > you area in this response. Soon after, a questionnaire will be
> > > > > > > sent to you to fill out. Than either the area director for your
> > > > > > > domicile shall contact you regarding that questionnaire or
> > > > > > > I shall be directed to do so as I am your first contact in that
> > > > > > > interest in joining.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I would really like to talk to other members of INEGroup. That is not
> > > > > > directed against you but it is usually useful to talk to other members
> > > > > > of an organisation to get a broader perspective into the goals.
> > > > >
> > > > > Our goals are well known and documented.
> > > >
> > > > They are?
> > >
> > > Yes. Review the ICANN comments list archives, the DNSO GA
> > > lists archives. News.com's archives, the DOC/NTIA documentation
> > > and various mailing list archives as just a few places where you can find
> > > this information.
> >
> > So you are unable to just give out some of this "documents"?
>
> This documents? What "This Documents" are you referring to?
> BTW this sentence also is not constructed correctly I believe...
> Work on your sentence construction in english.
Will do.
So there is nothing about the goals and aims of INEGroup you can show
me?
Preferably not written by you?
> > > > > Some have been
> > > > > achieved, others are in progress and moving along nicely. As their
> > > > > spokesman, I would be your point of contact for this sort
> > > > > of information. We speak with one voice.
> > > >
> > > > So, you are the lone voice of INEGroup and EVERY contact to other
> > > > members have to get your approval?
> > >
> > > No.
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> > "I would be your point of contact..."
>
> This is true, I would be until or unless you have joined INEGroup.
I thought so.
You are the gatekeeper of INEGroup, there is simply no chance to
reach anybody else of the alleged thousands of members?
Nice picture.
> > > > Sounds like a religious sect to me with you as the guru.
> > >
> > > How so? Please elaborate freely.
> >
> > Read above.
>
> I did. And nothing you stated in response remotely indicated such.
> You are in each post on this thread digging yourself into a deeper
> argumentative grave. However you are also with each post
> to me being automatically copied to all of the INEGroup
> members as I have now indicated twice.
When did you write something about copying my posts?
> Hence your request
> to talk of converse with our members is being met. If any of our
> members wish to contact you independently, they shall do so I
> am sure.
Yes, I am sure.
So, there is nobody out there...
> > > > > > Not all members are one heart and one soul.
> > > > > > (As can be seen here at atlarge ;- ) )
> > > > >
> > > > > I cannot speak to the "heart and soul" of each of our members.
> > > >
> > > > And because of this I want to talk directly to other members.
> > >
> > > You are in this very post.
> >
> > You are many?
> > Your name is legion, by any chance?
>
> No my name is Jeffrey A. Williams. INEGroup is not so
> many either.
Well, 129,000,000 members I would call "many".
> > > > Because, to say it frankly, you ARE a really bad spokesperson for
> > > > any type of group.
> > >
> > > Perhaps in your opinion. However in the vast majority of INEGRoup's
> > > opinion, is much different than yours.
> >
> > This I believe you.
> >
> > So, in conclusion, you are unable to put me in touch with other
> > members of INEGroup?
>
> No, you are already in touch with them with this and all of your
> previous posts on this and other theards...
No, I am not.
There are just the two of us.
I dont hear any voices...
greetings
Holger
--
######################################
Holger Steiner
Programmer & Consultant
Synchron GmbH
h.steiner@synchron-is.de
http://www.synchron-is.de
<script>alert("Only the code gets executed, not the
intentions...")</script>
######################################
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de